Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Demonized]

Some people find it so hard to accept they don't rule the world 
The most obvious reply would be: "look who's talking" or something like that. So  surprise me...

[PeterJvM]

This has nothing to do with ruling, it was merely a suggestion,
obviously some people find it hard to read.

Some people find it so hard to accept they don't rule the world 
The most obvious reply would be: "look who's talking" or something like that. So  surprise me...

[Demonized]

This has nothing to do with ruling, it was merely a suggestion,
obviously some people find it hard to read.

Well, quoting you literally here

However quite af few posters on this FORUM may not agree with this

...

Do you see the connection with my response? Apparently hard to read and I obviously wasn't talking about you (unless...)...

[gelni]

Guess who has to pay for the postage and packaging to send this router back to the reseller – ME!
Never again Dlink – never, ever again!

WHAT A COMPLETE JOKE!

[Demonized]

You really are not very creative with your primary reactions?
You haven't been around so long in this world it seems. You always need to pay yourself for RMA, this is Dlink independent so to say.

[gelni]

Yeah – well if the router didn’t have a design fault – I wouldn’t have to pay a thing – would I!
Use your head!

[Demonized]

A design fault? Don't make me laugh. You really are a funny man.

[gelni]

“Funny man” – I don’t think so – more like an extremely “unhappy man” with this elementary design fault of the dir655. THIS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY A NUMBER OF USERS!

[Demonized]

So file a complaint with the authorities if you're so sure about "an elementary design fault'.

And a number of users' really doesn't mean a thing. Absolutely nothing.

I am expecting to see real evdence now for theis design fault. In which case mentioning an issue is not prove or evidence. You really need to provide the technical details to point out the design flaws.

Show us that your opinion is really an evidence-based and analysed like an IT Pro.
I'm really looking forward to your thesis about the 655. Welcome to IT PRO world.

[gelni]

How about this one – a second DIR 655 – installed at a different client premises has just come up with the same problem!

I CANNOT BELIEVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Demonized]

Wow, a second one. It's truly a disgrace. Two routers...What are the odds?

There is one other common element with the two routers: You. Does that mean you might have an elementary design flaw? 

EDit: A 'second one', in all honesty,  does not qualify as 'fact-based' evidence. Still waiting....

[criminalmind]

Hello!I am new here.I had the same problem with saving settings (A4 1.21EU) without “init failed”.The fix?The latest firmware 132b02NA_beta01.Good luck!

[tiagomiguel]

Like someone explained before you can saev the port forwrds in a strange way.

Reset router
Turn Off Securespot
Reboot router
Make your rules
reboot router
Turn on Securespot
reboot router

It worked for me but it's annoying not seeing a new firmwarecomming out to fix this problem because there's alot of people complaining about the same thing.

[Xinot]

And im just wondering what do i have enabled if i turn securespot on anyways without any active account.. Especially if it has this kind of side effects. 

syslog:
D-Link Systems DIR-655 System Log: Local firewall edits sent successfully   

[Demonized]

And im just wondering what do i have enabled if i turn securespot on anyways without any active account.. Especially if it has this kind of side effects. 

syslog:
D-Link Systems DIR-655 System Log: Local firewall edits sent successfully   

I guess Securespot sets the firewall to 'strict'. Sounds logical.