D-Link Forums

The Graveyard - Products No Longer Supported => D-Link Storage => DNS-321 => Topic started by: ngcreese on May 07, 2009, 09:30:14 PM

Title: XBOX 360 53-C00DF238 Error
Post by: ngcreese on May 07, 2009, 09:30:14 PM
Well I'm new to the DNS-321 dlink NAS family...  Hooray for going GREEN!!

Tonight I hooked up my new lil NAS box, upgraded the firmware to 1.01.
Slid a WD Caviar Green 1.5TB in.
Loaded the quick search software to get to the NAS from Windows Vista 64bit.
I allowed the NAS to format the drive
The NAS did sit around 94% for about 10 to 15mins during the format process, but after reading about this, I was totally expecting a 45 min wait, at the 94% point.

Time to test it with the XBOX 360!!

I left the NAS' default IP address @ 192.168.0.10 .
Enabled NAS' UPnP Server.
Made a folder, dropped an .AVI file in it.
Unchecked "Root"
Browsed to the folder with the .AVI file in it.
Clicked “Save Settings”
Clicked "Refresh".
Web Page went to "100%"


Tried to watch an .AVI file....
Xbox 360     
No luck!!
Xbox sees the Dlink, and can maneuver down to the .AVI file I put on the Dlink NAS.
However, I got a "53-C00DF238" error from the xbox 360 when I attempted to actually view the video.

Read the forums about problems with the PS3 and UPnP… when 192.168.0.xxx is used…
Forums folks say… use 192.168.1.xxx because it’s a confirmed problem.

I switched the DNS-321 IP address over to 192.168.1.10… and I can now watch my videos on my XBOX 360.

Question… What is the deal with  xxx.xxx.0.xxx  causing UPnP based video playback to fail???
Title: Re: XBOX 360 53-C00DF238 Error
Post by: D-Link Multimedia on May 08, 2009, 12:03:51 PM
It is a bug...and it has already been corrected in an upcomming firmware.
Title: Re: XBOX 360 53-C00DF238 Error
Post by: ngcreese on May 08, 2009, 04:32:37 PM
What's the projected date for your next firmware release?

BTW, outside of the quirk, very nice product!!
Small, neat, quiet... and an electricity bill saver.

Title: Re: XBOX 360 53-C00DF238 Error
Post by: D-Link Multimedia on May 08, 2009, 05:38:27 PM
It is in beta right now however it has not been officially approved and has not gone through stability testing. Can't really give you an eta at this time.