• April 24, 2024, 01:37:42 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

This Forum Beta is ONLY for registered owners of D-Link products in the USA for which we have created boards at this time.

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Poor performance on gigabit Network  (Read 18493 times)

JavaLawyer

  • BETA Tester
  • Level 15 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12190
  • D-Link Global Forum Moderator
    • FoundFootageCritic
Re: Poor performance on gigabit Network
« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2013, 11:18:48 AM »

. . . I should also note that I am still using the factory installed firmware. Will update later to see if there's any performance improvement.

Never mind. . . firmware is already the latest version.
Logged
Find answers here: D-Link ShareCenter FAQ I D-Link Network Camera FAQ
There's no such thing as too many backups FFC

gera_b

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Poor performance on gigabit Network
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2013, 12:52:34 PM »

NAS (D-Link)

FW 1.01 03/15/2012
Adaptive Load Balancing
2 x 1Gbit ports to TP-LINK TL-WR1043ND
2 x 2TB Hitachi (HDS723020BLA642) in RAID 1

PC
1 x 1Gbit port
1 x WDC 2.5'' 500GB 7200rpm (WD5000BPKT)

SAMBA
NAS -> PC 85-100 MB
PC -> NAS 50-55 MB
Logged

astropolak

  • Level 1 Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Poor performance on gigabit Network
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2013, 07:45:11 PM »

Hi
DNS-345 latest firmware (Beta), 4 x Seagate ST2000DM001 in raid 5, SMB/CIFS connection, single redundant LAN connection.

DNS-345 >Dlink Gigabit Switch > Win7 64

As seen by the PC, 1GB file:

Download 90MB/s sustained
Upload 40GB/s sustained

I have been using Qnap for years now, the Download speed is higher than the TS-639 I have.
I can with reasonable confidence say that the Qnap as a company and their software on their product is a total POS, their hardware is very nice but we the Qnap users have been suffering for years with substandard firmware that Qnap has no interest in fixing.

I came here from DNS-343 and was smitten by its simplicity, true function and purpose, the DNS-345 is much faster but preseves what I've always liked in the earlier model.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 12:22:13 AM by astropolak »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]