While we understand that you would like it have it removed, there are many other customers that would like to keep the feature. What we're attempting to do is come up with a solution that doesn't require D-link to maintain two firmware sets.
Coming from a software development background I do share compassion for the desire to maintain a single firmware set, but I disagree that this is the correct decision for the issues that come with SecureSpot.
Access Control does not seem to be working. It sounds to me that the viability of Shareport is iffy (I do not use this but it sounds as if there are some issues with it). Disabling QoS and other features is a solution repeatedly recommended on these forums. There are numerous threads of people proclaiming that they have become SecureSpot free by purchasing a competitor's product, or even regressing to using their old equipment. Securespot was not an advertised feature of the DIR-655 at the time of my purchase, whereas the inoperable features mentioned above were and still are.
It would seem that more emphasis is being placed on keeping subscribing SecureSpot clientele (which are an obvious minority among the users on this forum) than repairing some of the advertised features of the router.
Using the Russian firmware downgrade path to regain stability provided by 1.2X or even 1.1X firmware is very common. Others have opted to use the EU flavoured firmware rather than use a version with SecureSpot present. I do not believe that technical support would support these firmware releases, and the first recommendation from them would be to update to the latest official release of firmware, correct?
The "single firmware set" mentality is driving technically proficient users away from the most current released firmware and the D-Link name itself in droves. For each person who posts their grievances with SecureSpot there are dozens who will simply lurk and watch for results or solutions.
The problem with SecureSpot hijacking the
basic ability of the router to the bsecure website is a
huge breach of trust for people who understand the implications of the problem. Personally I want the ability to block all traffic between my router and bsecure as a guarantee that SecureSpot has been contained.
Don't get me wrong--I am a big fan of the 1.34 beta firmware and have not seen any further hijacking problems since I have had it installed. Let's keep moving in the right direction to get a solid version with everything working. Does SecureSpot need to be temporarily removed to simplify the process, as it obviously has some conflicts with Access Control?
Can we have some more information of why the enable/disable SecureSpot checkbox wasn't working prior to 1.34NA?